• About
  • Events
  • Community Calendar
  • Advertise
  • Subscriptions
  • Foundation
  • Contact
  • Seattle Chinese Post

Northwest Asian Weekly

  • Community
    • Names in the News
    • Local
    • Business
    • Pictorials
    • Obituaries
  • Nation
  • World
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Columns
    • On the Shelf
    • At the Movies
    • A-POP!
    • Publisher Ng’s blog
    • The Layup Drill
    • Travel
    • Wayne’s Worlds
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentary
    • Publisher Ng’s blog
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Astrology
  • Classifieds
  • Community Calendar
You are here: Home / Opinion / Editorials / EDITORIAL: Geomanagement is a large step back for the IDCCC

EDITORIAL: Geomanagement is a large step back for the IDCCC

November 21, 2012 By Northwest Asian Weekly

Since the International District/Chinatown Community Center opened in 2005, it has enjoyed high usage rates and a large amount of community support. It’s been an issue the ID could unite around. When the original plans didn’t include a gym, the community responded by raising $2 million to ensure adequate facilities. Unfortunately, it’s in danger — not from a determined malicious attack, but by a management oversight.

The new geogroup management system, which the City of Seattle is implementing in the name of efficiency, is hurting the center. The basis of the system is that if the city is split into regions and diverts resources from smaller community centers in a region to larger ones, it’ll be able to service the same amount or more people for the same amount or less resources, because the people who would normally go to the smaller centers will go to the larger ones. This means that the IDCCC hours are being cut to a planned 25 hours of programming a week, to the benefit of the larger community centers, such as Yesler or Jefferson.

This plan might sound great on paper, but, like many plans that sound great on paper, it’s execution is beyond poor. The plan drafters failed to take into account the individuals that the center serves. Our community’s seniors are one of the largest groups of users, and they are not mobile and very often do not speak English. The youth also use the community center, especially after school. By the time they can make it to Yesler on a school day, the afternoon is gone. Not to mention the younger kids whose parents wouldn’t allow them to travel far alone. Members of our community are not going to the larger centers as anticipated — they’re just not being served at all, and this is unacceptable.

Efficient use of resources is important, yes, but those resources are meant to help people, and if the changes that are currently proposed go through, many people will no longer be helped. (end)

To contact the Seattle City Council, e-mail council@seattle.gov.

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Editorials Tagged With: 2012, IDCCC, International District Chinatown Community Center, Seattle City Council, Vol 31 No 48 | November 24 - November 30

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Find us on Issuu!

Subscribe to our e-news

© 2020 NORTHWEST ASIAN WEEKLY
412 MAYNARD AVE. S., SEATTLE, WA 98104
206-223-5559 | INFO@NWASIANWEEKLY.COM
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.