• About
  • Events
  • Community Calendar
  • Advertise
  • Subscriptions
  • Foundation
  • Contact
  • Seattle Chinese Post

Northwest Asian Weekly

  • Community
    • Names in the News
    • Local
    • Business
    • Pictorials
    • Obituaries
  • Nation
  • World
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Columns
    • On the Shelf
    • At the Movies
    • A-POP!
    • Publisher Ng’s blog
    • The Layup Drill
    • Travel
    • Wayne’s Worlds
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentary
    • Publisher Ng’s blog
    • Letters to the Editor
  • Astrology
  • Classifieds
  • Community Calendar
You are here: Home / Opinion / Letters to the Editor / Letter: Washington First International coverage was uneven and biased

Letter: Washington First International coverage was uneven and biased

July 8, 2010 By Northwest Asian Weekly

To the Editor:

I am disappointed by your coverage of Washington First International Bank (in the June 19–25 issue).

Earlier in the year, you published an article titled “Washington First Weathers Storm of Controversy with FDIC List.”

Being on the list is a sign of severe financial distress, yet the article paints a picture that all is well. It even quotes Elizabeth Huang as saying, “Our liquidity is strong,” and that she is positive that WFIB will rebound quickly. It certainly gives one the impression that the situation is not that serious. Instead of serious probing journalism that would benefit your readers, your paper allowed Huang to promote her agenda.

Then your paper ran a recent story titled “After 20 years, Chinese bank forced to close its doors.” In it, it revealed how some investors lost money and how shocked they were that the bank was forced to close. Huang was quoted saying, “Our 21 years of hard work to build the bank and help the community are now gone.”

I feel your story here is totally one-sided. I am a veteran banker with many years of commercial lending experience with some of the largest banks in the country. Banks that go belly up usually do so because they have poor or inadequate risk management. They became greedy with the bull market in real estate and assume it will continue forever. They took risks without regard to the consequences.

Your article, however, made it sound as though the economy was the sole cause for the bank’s troubles. The real estate collapse, of course, had an impact, but banks are supposed to manage their portfolios through changing market conditions. Although we have seen many banks close, the vast majority of banks in this country remain sound and are not on the FDIC list.

You have to ask why? The reason is because they took prudent risks, avoided over concentration of assets, and had proper risk management procedures. WFIB probably didn’t, and your article failed to give a balanced view on the real reasons for the demise of this bank.

— David Grant

Share:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Letters to the Editor Tagged With: 2010, Chinese, David Grant, Elizabeth Huang, FDIC, Letter Washington First International, Vol 29 No 28 | July 10 - July 16, WFIB, Washington First International Bank

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube


Find us on Issuu!

Subscribe to our e-news

© 2022 NORTHWEST ASIAN WEEKLY
412 MAYNARD AVE. S., SEATTLE, WA 98104
206-223-5559 | INFO@NWASIANWEEKLY.COM
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.